Mission Statement

The Rant's mission is to offer information that is useful in business administration, economics, finance, accounting, and everyday life. The mission of the People of God is to be salt of the earth and light of the world. This people is "a most sure seed of unity, hope, and salvation for the whole human race." Its destiny "is the Kingdom of God which has been begun by God himself on earth and which must be further extended until it has been brought to perfection by him at the end of time."

Tuesday, October 20, 2020

Foundations of Financial Management: An Analysis (part 19)


“When prosperity comes, do not use all of it.”

~Confucius~


Current Asset Management

by

Charles Lamson


Collections and Disbursements


Managing the cash inflows and payments is a function of many variables such as a float, the mail system, use of electronic funds transfer mechanisms, lock boxes, international sales, and more. These are presented in detail in the following section.



Float


Some people are shocked to realize that even the most trusted asset on a corporation's books, cash, may not portray actual dollars at a given time. There are actually two cash balances of importance: the corporation's recorded amount and the amount credited to the corporation by the bank. The difference between the two is called float, and it arises from time delays in mailing, processing, and clearing checks through the banking system. Once a check is received in the mail and a deposit is made, the deposited funds are not available for use until the check has cleared the banking system and has been credited to the corporate bank account. This works both for checks written to pay suppliers as well as checks deposited from customers. This means float can be managed to some extent through a combination of disbursement and collection strategies. 


We examine the use of float in Table 1 below. Our firm has deposited $1,000,000 in checks received from customers during the week and has written $900,000 in checks to suppliers. If the initial balance were $100,000, the corporate books would show $200,000. But what will the bank records show in the way of the usable funds? Perhaps $800,000 of the checks from customers will have cleared accounts at other banks and been credited to us, while only $400,000 of our checks may have completed a similar cycle. As indicated in Table 1, we have used "float" to provide us with $300,000 extra in available short-term funds. 


Table 1 The use of float to provide funds


Some companies actually operate with a negative cash balance on the corporate books, knowing float will carry them through at the bank. In a follow-up to the example in Table 1, the firm may write $1.2 million in checks on the assumption that only $800,000 will clear by the end of the week, thus leaving it with surplus funds in the bank account. The results, shown in Table 2, represent the phenomenon known as playing the float. A float of $200,000 turns a negative balance on the corporation's books into a positive temporary balance on the bank's book.



Improving Collections


We may expedite the collection and check-clearing process through a number of strategies. A popular method is to utilize a variety of collection centers throughout our marketing area. An insurance company such as Allstate, with headquarters in Chicago, may have 75 collection offices dispersed throughout the country, each performing a billing and collection deposit function. One of the collection offices in San Francisco using a local bank, may be able to clear a check on a San Jose Bank in one day whereas a Chicago bank would require a substantially longer time to remit and clear the check at the California Bank.


For those who wish to enjoy the benefits of expeditions check clearance at lower costs, a lockbox system may replace the network of regional collection offices. Under this plan, customers are requested to forward their checks to a post office box in their geographic region and a local bank pick up the checks. The bank can then process the local checks through the local clearinghouse for rapid collection and have the funds available for use in 24 hours or less. Whether the corporation uses a collection system or the less-expensive lockbox system, excess cash balances at the local thanks are remitted to the corporate headquarter bank through a daily wire transfer or automated clearing house that makes the funds immediately available for corporate use.



Extending Disbursements


Perhaps you have heard of the multimillion-dollar corporation with its headquarters located in the most exclusive office space in downtown Manhattan, but with its primary check disbursement Center in Fargo, North Dakota. Though the firm may engage in aggressive speedup techniques in the processing of incoming checks, a slowdown pattern more aptly describes the payment procedures.


While the preceding example represents an extreme case, the slowing of disbursements is not uncommon in cash management. It has even been given the title "extended disbursement float." Many full-service banks offer services to control disbursements, and also reconcile discrepancies between the Federal Reserve's check processing system and the bank's totals. This allows the company to time their payments so that they hold their cash balances as long as possible. While it is not the intent of this analysis to encourage or discourage such practices, they're fairly widespread use is worthy of note.


Cost-Benefit Analysis


An efficiently maintained cash management program can be an expensive operation. The use of remote collection and disbursement centers involves additional costs, and banks involved in the process will require that the firm maintain adequate deposit balances or pay sufficient fees to justify the services. Though the use of a lockbox system may reduce total corporate overhead, the costs may still be substantial.


These expenses must be compared to the benefits that may accrue through the use of cost-benefit analysis. If a firm has an average daily remittance of $2 million and 1.5 days can be saved in the collection process by establishing a sophisticated collection network, the firm has freed $3 million for investment elsewhere. Also, through stretching the disbursement schedule by one day, perhaps another $2 million will become available for alternate uses. An example of this process is shown in Figure 3. If the firm is able to earn 10 percent on the 5 million dollars that is freed up, as much as $500,000 may be expended on the administrative costs of cash management before the new costs are equal to the generated revenue.


Figure 3 Cash management network


Electronic Funds Transfer


Some of the techniques of delaying payment and using float are being reduced through the techniques of electronic funds transfer; a system in which funds are moved between computer terminals without the use of a check. Through the use of terminal communication between the store and the bank, your payment to the supermarket is automatically charged against your account at the bank before you walk out the door.


Most large corporations have computerized cash management systems. For example, a firm may have 55 branch offices and 56 banks, one bank for each branch office and a lead bank in which the major corporate account is kept. At the end of each day the financial manager can check all the company's bank accounts through an online computer terminal. He or she can then electronically transfer all excess cash balances from each branch or regional bank to the corporate lead bank for overnight investment and money market securities.


Automated Clearing Houses (ACH) are an important element in electronic funds transfers. An ACH transfers information between one financial institution and another and from account to account via computer tape. There are 40 Regional automated clearing houses throughout the United States, claiming total membership of over 25,000 financial institutions (newyorkfed.org). These institutions transmit or receive ACH entries through Central clearing facilities operated by the American Clearing House Association, the Federal Reserve System, the electronic payment Network, and Visa (Block & Hirt, 2005, p. 182). 


The National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA), nacha.org, states that 2018 was a milestone year for the ACH Network. Payment volume climbed by almost 1.5 billion payments, the fourth straight year the ACH Network has added more than 1 billion new payments. ACH Network volume reached nearly 23 billion payments in 2018, a year-over-year increase of 6.9 percent and the highest growth rate since 2008. That is nearly 70 payments for every person in the U.S.


The value of ACH payments in 2018 was $51.2 trillion, a 9.5 percent increase over 2017. It marked the sixth consecutive year in which ACH payment value has risen by at least one trillion dollars. For perspective, the value of last year's ACH payments was more than two and a half times that of the nation's 2017 gross domestic product. 


Same-day ACH volume soared in 2018, the first full year with same-day debits as well as credits. There were nearly 178 million same-day ACH payments last year: 98.3 million credits and 79.7 million debits. Overall the same-day ACH volume jumped 137 percent from 2017. Total same-day ACH value in 2018 was 159.9 billion dollars, up 83 percent over the year before.


"The results for 2018 make clear that the ACH Network is vibrant and continues to be a vital component of the nation's economic engine," said Chief Operating Officer Jane Larimer. "With more enhancements to Same Day ACH being rolled out this year and next, the experience for businesses and consumers will only get better." 


Figure 4 diagrams the flow of funds through the ACH Network. The originator can be an individual, corporation, or other entity that initiates entrees into the automated clearinghouse network. The originator forwards the credit or debit transactions data to an originating depository financial institution (ODFI), which then sorts and transmits the file to an automated clearinghouse operator. The ACH then distributes the file to the receiving depository financial institution (RDFI), which then makes the use of funds available to the individual, corporation, or other entity that has authorized the originator to initiate a credit or debit entry to the receiver's account held at the RDFI.


Figure 4 ACH network


International electronic funds transfer is mainly carried out through SWIFT. SWIFT is an acronym for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications. SWIFT provides around-the-clock international payments between banks---foreign exchange and trade transactions, and cash flows due to international securities transactions. Having disrupted the manual processes that were the norm of the past, SWIFT is now a global financial infrastructure that spans every continent, 200+ countries and territories, and services more than 11,000 institutions around the world (www.swift.com).


Rigid security standards are enforced, each message is encrypted (secretly coded), and every money transaction is authenticated by another code. These security measures are important to the members as well as to SWIFT, which assumes the financial liability for the accuracy, completeness, and confidentiality of transaction instructions from and to the point of connection to member institution circuits.



International Cash Management


Multinational corporations can shift funds around from country to country much as a firm may transfer funds from Regional Banks to the Lead Bank. Just as financial institutions in the United States have become more involved in electronic funds transfer, an international payment system has also developed. International cash management has many differences from domestic-based cash management systems. Payment methods differ from country to country. For example in Poland, Russia, and other Eastern European countries, checks were seldom used in preference to cash, and in other countries, electronic payments are more common than in the United States. International cash management is more complex because liquidity management, involving short-term cash balances and deficits, has to be managed across international boundary and time zones and is subject to the risks of currency fluctuations and interest rate changes in all countries. There are also differences in banking systems and check clearing processes, account balance management, information reporting systems, and cultural, tax, and accounting differences.


A company may prefer to hold cash balances in one currency rather than another or to take advantage of the high interest rates available in a particular country for short-term investments and marketable securities. In periods in which one country's currency is rising in value relative to other currencies, an astute financial manager will try to keep as much cash as possible in the country with the strong currency. In periods in which the dollar is rising relative to other currencies, many balances are held in U.S. bank accounts or in dollar-denominated bank accounts in foreign banks, more commonly known as euro dollar deposits. The international money markets have been growing in scope and size, so these markets have become a much more important aspect of efficient cash management.


International and domestic cash managers employ the same techniques and rely on forecasting methods using cash budgets and daily cash reports to predict cash balances. For those companies that are unable to actively manage their cash balances, banks often provide them special accounts to manage their cash flow and earn a return on their excess cash. The sweep account is one such account that allows companies to maintain zero balances with all their access cash swept into an interest-earning account. Most banks have accounts that allow corporate clients to write checks on zero balance accounts with the understanding that when the check is presented for payment, money will be moved from the interest-bearing account to the appropriate account. These examples illustrate the way banks help manage excess cash for their corporate customers. The next post explains how companies manage their own excess cash balances by purchasing marketable securities. 


*MAIN SOURCE: BLOCK & HIRT, 2005, FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 11TH ED., PP. 177-184*


end

Sunday, October 18, 2020

Foundations of Financial Management: An Analysis (part 18)


“Fortune befriends the bold.”

~Emily Dickinson~


 Working Capital and the Financing Decision (Part D)

by

Charles Lamson


A Decision Process


Assume we are comparing alternative financing plans for working capital. As indicated in Table 7 below, $500,000 of working capital current assets must be financed for the Edwards Corporation. Under Plan A, we will finance all our current asset needs with short-term funds (fourth numerical line), while under Plan B we will finance only a relatively small portion of current assets with short-term money---relying heavily on long-term funds. In either case we will carry $100,000 of fixed assets with long-term financing commitments. As indicated in part 3 of table 7, under Plan A we will finance total needs of $600,000 with $500,000 of short-term financing and $100,000 of long-term financing, whereas with Plan B we will finance $150,000 short-term and $450,000 long-term.


Table 7   Alternative Financing Plans


Plan A carries the lower cost of financing, with interest of 6 percent on $500,000 of the $600,000 required. We show the impact of both plans on bottom line earnings in Table 8. Assuming the firm generates $200,000 in earnings before interest and taxes, Plan A will provide after-tax earnings of $80,000, while Plan B will generate only $73,000.


Table 8 Impact of financing plans on earnings


Introducing Varying Conditions


Although plan A, employing cheaper short-term sources of financing, appears to provide $7,000 more in return, this is not always the case. During tight money periods, when capital is scarce, short-term financing may be difficult to find or may carry exorbitant rates. Furthermore, inadequate financing may mean lost sales or financial embarrassment. For these reasons, the firm may wish to evaluate Plans A and B based on differing assumptions about the economy and the money markets.


Expected Value


Past history combined with economic forecasting may indicate an 80 percent probability of normal events and a 20 percent chance of extremely tight money. Using Plan A, under normal conditions the Edwards Corporation will enjoy a $7,000 superior return over Plan B as previously indicated in Table 8. Let us now assume that under disruptive tight money conditions, Plan A would provide $15,000 lower return than Plan B because of high short-term interest rates. These conditions are summarized in Table 9, and an expected value of return is computed. The expected value represents the sum of the expected outcomes under the two conditions.


Table 9 Expected returns under different economic conditions


We see that even when downside risk is considered, Plan A carries a higher expected return of $2,600. For another firm, XYZ, in the same industry that might suffer $50,000 lower returns during tight money conditions, Plan A becomes too dangerous to undertake, as indicated in Table 10. Plan A's expected return is now $4,400 less than that of Plan B.


Table 10 Expected returns for high-risk firm


Toward an Optimal Policy


As previously indicated, the firm should attempt to relate asset liquidity to financing patterns, and vice versa. In Table 11, a number of working capital alternatives are presented. Along the top of the table we show asset liquidity; along the side, the type of financing arrangement. The combined impact of the two variables is shown in each of the four panels of the table. 


Table 11 Asset liquidity and financing assets


In using table 11, each firm must decide how it wishes to combine asset liquidity and financing needs. The aggressive, risk oriented-firm in Panel 1 will borrow short-term and maintain relatively low levels of liquidity, hoping to increase profit. It will benefit from low-cost financing and high-return assets, but it will be vulnerable to a credit crunch. The more conservative firm, following the plan in Panels 4, will utilize established long-term financing and maintain a high degree of liquidity. In Panels 2 and 3, we see more moderate positions in which the firm compensates for short-term financing with highly liquid assets (2) or balances off low liquidity with precommitted, long-term financing (3).


Each financial manager must structure his or her working capital position and the associated risk-return trade-off to meet the company's needs. For firms whose cash flow patterns are predictable, typified by the public utilities sector, a low degree of liquidity can be maintained. Immediate access to capital markets, such as that enjoyed by large prestigious firm, also allows a greater risk-taking capability. In each case, the ultimate concern must be for maximizing the overall valuation of the firm through a judicious consideration of risk-return options.


In the next several posts, we will examine the various methods for managing the individual components of working capital. We will consider the techniques for managing cash, marketable securities, receivables, and inventory. We will look at trade and bank credit and also at other sources of short-term funds.



Summary


Working capital management involves the financing and controlling of the current assets of the firm. These current assets include cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, and inventory. A firm's ability to properly manage current assets and the associated liability obligations may determine how well it is able to survive in the short run.


Because the firm with continuous operations will always maintain minimum levels of current assets, management must be able to distinguish between those current assets that are permanent and those that are temporary or cyclical. In order to determine the permanent or cyclical nature of turn set, the Financial Manager must give careful attention to the growth and sales and the relationship of the production process to sales. Level production and a seasonal sales environment increases operating efficiency, but it also calls for more careful financial planning.


In general, the writers of Foundations of Financial Management (Block & Hirt, 2005, p. 166) advocate tying the maturity of the financing plan to the maturity of the current assets. That is, finance short-term cyclical current assets with short-term liabilities and permanent current assets with long-term sources of funds. In order to carry out the company's financing plan with minimum cost, the financial manager must keep an eye on the general cost of borrowing, the term structure of interest rates, the relative volatility of short and long-term rates, and predict, if possible, any change in the direction of interest rate movements.


Because the yield curve is usually upward-sloping, long-term financing is generally more expensive than short-term financing. This lower-cost in favor of short-term financing must be weighed against the risk that short-term rates are more volatile than long-term rates. Additionally, if long-term rates are expected to rise, the financial manager may want to lock in long-term financing needs before they do.



The firm has a number of risk-return decisions to consider. Though long-term financing provides a safety margin for the availability of funds, its higher cost may reduce the profit potential of the firm. On the asset side, carrying highly liquid current assets assures the bill-paying capability of the firm but detracts from profit potential. Each firm must tailor the various risk-return trade-offs to meet its own needs. The peculiarities of a firm's industry will have a major impact on the options open to its management. 


*MAIN SOURCE: BLOCK & HIRT, 2005, FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 11TH ED., PP. 161-166*


end

Saturday, October 17, 2020

Foundations of Financial Management: An Analysis (part 17)


“To contract new debts is not the way to pay old ones.”

~George Washington~


Working Capital and the Financing Decision

(part C)

by

Charles Lamson 


Patterns of Financing


The financial manager's selection of external sources of funds to finance assets may be one of the firm's most important decisions. The axiom that all current assets should be financed by current liabilities (accounts payable, bank loans, commercial paper, etc.) is subject to challenge when one sees the permanent buildup that can occur in current assets. In the Yawakuzi example from last post, the build-up in inventory was substantial at $9 million. The example had a logical conclusion in that the motorcycles were sold, cash was generated, and current assets became very liquid. What if a much smaller level of sales had occurred? Yawakuzi would be sitting on a large inventory that needed to be financed and would be generating no cash. Theoretically, the firm could be declared technically insolvent (bankrupt) if short-term sources of funds were used but were unable to be renewed when they came due. How would the interest and principal be paid without cash flow from inventory liquidation? The most appropriate financing pattern would be one in which asset build-up and length of financing terms are perfectly matched, as indicated in Figure 5.


Figure 5

In the upper part of Figure 5 we see that the temporary buildup in current assets represented by orange is financed by short-term funds. More importantly, however, permanent current assets and fixed assets both represented by blue are financed with long-term funds from the sale of stock, the issuance of bonds, or retention of earnings.



Alternative Plans


Only a financial manager with unusual insight and timing could construct a financial plan for working capital that adhered perfectly to the design in Figure 5. The difficulty rests in determining precisely what part of current assets is temporary and what part is permanent. Even if dollar amounts could be ascertained, the exact timing of asset liquidation is a difficult matter. To compound the problem, we are never quite sure how much short-term or long-term financing is available at a given time. While the precise synchronization of temporary current assets and short-term financing depicted in Figure 5 may be the most desirable and logical plan, other alternatives must be considered.


Long-Term Financing 


To protect against the danger of not being able to provide adequate short-term financing in tight money periods, the financial manager may rely on long-term funds to cover some short-term needs. As indicated in Figure 6, long-term capital is now being used to finance fixed assets, permanent current assets, and part of temporary current assets. 



Figure 6


By using long-term capital to cover part of the short-term needs, the firm virtually assures itself of having adequate capital at all times. The firm may prefer to borrow a million dollars for 10 years rather than attempt to borrow a million at the beginning of each year for 10 years and pay it back at the end of each year.



Short-Term Financing (Opposite Approach)


This is not to say that all financial managers utilize long-term financing on a large scale. To acquire long-term funds, the firm must generally go to the capital markets with a bond or stock offering or must privately place longer-term obligations with insurance companies, wealthy individuals, and so forth. Many small businesses do not have access to such long-term capital and are forced to rely heavily on short-term bank and trade credit.


Furthermore, short-term financing offers some advantages over more extended financial arrangements. As a general rule, the interest rate on short-term funds is lower than on long-term funds. We might surmise then that a firm could develop a working capital financing plan in which short-term funds are used to finance not only temporary current assets, but also part of the permanent working capital needs of the firm. As depicted in Figure 7, bank and trade credit as well as other sources of short-term financing are now supporting part of the permanent capital asset needs of the firm.


Figure 7

The Financing Decision


Some corporations are more flexible than others because they are not locked into a few available sources of funds. Corporations would like many financing alternatives in order to minimize their cost of funds at any point. Unfortunately, not many firms are in this enviable position through the duration of a business cycle. During an economic boom period, a shortage of low-cost alternatives exists, and firms often minimize their financing costs by raising funds in advance of forecasted asset needs.


Not only does the financial manager encounter a timing problem, but he or she also needs to select the right type of financing. Even for companies having many alternative sources of funds, there may be only one or two decisions that will look good in retrospect. At the time the financing decision is made, the financial manager is never sure it is the right one. Should the financing be long-term or short-term, debt or equity, and so on? Figure 8 is a decision-tree diagram that shows many of the financing choices available to a chief financial officer. A decision is made at each point until a final financing method is chosen. In most cases a corporation will use a combination of these financing methods. At all times the financial manager will balance short-term versus long-term considerations against the composition of the firm's assets and the firm's willingness to accept risk. The ratio of long-term financing to short-term financing at any point in time will be greatly influenced by the term structure of interest rates.


Figure 8 Decision tree of the financing decision



*MAIN SOURCE: BLOCK & HIRT, 2005, FOUNDATIONS OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 11TH ED., PP. 153-161*


end

Rosary from Lourdes - 02/12/2025