Mission Statement

The Rant's mission is to offer information that is useful in business administration, economics, finance, accounting, and everyday life. The mission of the People of God is to be salt of the earth and light of the world. This people is "a most sure seed of unity, hope, and salvation for the whole human race." Its destiny "is the Kingdom of God which has been begun by God himself on earth and which must be further extended until it has been brought to perfection by him at the end of time."

Friday, November 17, 2017

Alpha Teach Yourself Investing in 24 Hours: An Analysis (part 25)


Classifications of Stocks (part A)
by 
Charles Lamson


Growth Stocks

Once again, we step into the murky waters of classifications. Simply labeling a stock "growth" is not very helpful. How much growth? What kind of growth? Over what period of time?

Image result for ares

PROCEED WITH CAUTION
Quantifying growth will help you find and analyze growth stocks. Once you have a growth measdure as a goal, you can look for other companies that match the profile.

Of all the classifications we will look at, this is the hardest to pin down without some help from the experts. This help is free and readily available if you have access to the Intertnet. One of the best places to start is www.morningstar.com. This site has a tremendous amount of information and classifies individual stocks by their own system.

To help us get a handle on the whole growth issue, let us look at two companies that can be classified as "growth" companies. The first is the original Ma Bell, AT&T, which was reinventing itself as a major player in delivering Internet services in the 1990s.

In earlier posts, we noted that growth stocks usually do not pay dividends, yet here is a growth stock that does. What gives? This is another example of the slippery slope of classifications. Many people would put AT&T into the income category, a category that is often pictured as older, mature companies who are paying out most of their profits as dividends.

PROCEED WITH CAUTION
Companies can change the perception of their stock by taking bold and decisive steps to enter new markets and improve their current market position.


Image result for ares

AT&T is certainly mature, but toward the end of 1999 this "old" stock gained over 20 percent in three weeks! Does that sound like a dinosaur to you?

AT&T has forged some key partnerships and made significant acquisitions to petition itself as a player in the future of Internet communications, as well as regular telecommunications services.

If you were to make an investment decision based on growth alone, Amazon.com would seem to be the better choice.

.PROCEED WITH CAUTION
Comparing two dissimilar stocks is a waste of time and can be misleading. Use Morningstar.com or one of the other online services to identify peers of individual stocks. This service will also let you compare an individual stock with an average of all other stocks in the same classification.

Yet, this is not the whole picture; it points out a danger when looking for ways to define stocks. One measure is hardly ever enough to get an accurate picture. If you had to invest your life savings into one of these companies, which would you pick?


Image result for ares 

At the turn of the millenium, Amazon.com seemed like a place your investment could grow in a hurry. At the time, AT&T had $162.8 billion in assets and had been a successful company for many decades, while five years earlier nobody ever heard of Amazon.com and it had assets of only $2.2 billion. Would that change your mind?

In his book, Alpha Teach Yourself Investing in 24 Hours, Ken Little chose these two examples because they fall on opposite ends of the growth spectrum.

Morningstar called Amazon.com a "speculative growth" stock, meaning it could continue its explosive growth or implode and disappear altogether. At the time, the company had never earned a dollar and there were no profits on the horizon.

PROCEED WITH CAUTION
Not all growth measures are the same. What makes sense for one company may not for another.

Growth can be defined as growth in sales, profits, dividends, or a number of other criteria. Using sales, Amazon.com would clearly fall into the growth category. If you screened for companies showing growth in earnings, Amazon.com would not even be a blip, since it had no earnings at that time.


Image result for ares

In later posts, we will look at ways to screen stocks that meet your investment needs (and help you define what your needs are) through a set of parameters. This process will help you compare apples and apples.

As different as AT&T and Amazon.com are, they both have at least one thing in common: potential. Amazon.com is a trailblaizer in online commerce. It has obviously experienced explosive sales growth, going from virtually nothing to $1.2 billion in sales in only a few years before, the turn of the millenium. In addition, by the end of September 1999, it had over 13 million customers. That is the potential fueling the tremendous investor interest in a company that is broke by most accounting standards.



PROCEED WITH CAUTION
Older companies with significant asset bases tend to be less volatile than young companies without much underlying value.


AT&T, on the other hand, has a huge asset base and a tremendous position in the telecommunications market. Back then, bought a cable company, which gave it another entree to the consumer and business markets for high-speed access to the Internet. When combined with its traditional services, including wireless access, many investors felt they were in a commanding position to participate in the anticipated growth of high-speed Internet access.



On the other hand, Morningstar.com looked at AT&T a bit differently. The service uses a grading system that ranks each stock in the following areas:

  • Growth
  • Profitability
  • Financial health
  • Valuation
Image result for ares

These grading systems are another way to find comparisons of like stocks. It is also a way to quickly see where a stock may be strong or have some weakness. Morningstar.com arrives at these grades based on fairly detailed financial calculations that do not directly include potential. Let us see how the stocks do in a head-to-head grading using the Morningstar system:


Stock
Grades
AT&T
Amazon.com
Growth
C
A+
Profitability
A
F
Financial
Health
A
D-
Valuation
C
-

As we have already surmised, these two stoocks are nothing alike, yet they both could be called growth stocks of some sort.



The lesson here is that you should not get tipped up over broad terms such as "growth" when considering stocks. If you want an objective determination, use one of the several systems available, such Morningstar.com. This will help you compare like stocks.


Image result for ares

JUST A MINUTE
Picking a potential growth stock out of the bargain bin is not easy, but ultimately very rewarding.

*SOURCE: ALPHA TEACH YOURSELF INVESTING IN 24 HOURS, 2000, KEN LITTLE, PGS. 168-172*

END


No comments:

Post a Comment