Termination of Contracts (part B)
by
Charles Lamson
Remedies for Breach of Contract
If a breach of contract occurs, the innocent party has three courses of action that may be followed:
- Sue for damages
- Rescind the contract
- Sue for specific performance
Sue for Damages
The usual remedy for breach of contract is to sue for damages or a sum of money to compensate for the breach. A suit for damages really consists of two suits in one. The first requires proving breach of contract. The second requires proving damages. Four kinds of damages include: (1) nominal, (2) compensatory, (3) punitive, and (4) liquidated.
Nominal Damages. If the plaintiff in a breach of contract suit can prove that the defendant broke the contract but cannot prove any loss was sustained because of the breach, then the court will award nominal damages, generally one dollar, to symbolize vindication of the wrong done to the plaintiff.
Compensatory Damages. The theory of the law of damages is that an injured party should be compensated for any loss that may have been sustained but should not be permitted to profit from the other party's wrongdoing. When a breach of contract occurs, the law entitles the injured party to compensation for the exact amount of loss, but no more. Such damages are called compensatory damages. Sometimes the actual loss is easily determined, but at other times it is very difficult to determine. As a general rule, the amount of damages is a question for the jury to decide.
Punitive, or Exemplary, Damages. In most breach-of-contract cases, the awarding of compensatory damages fully meets the ends of justice. Cases occur, however, where compensatory damages are not adequate. In these instances the law may permit the plaintiff to receive punitive damages. Punitive damages are damages paid to the plaintiff in order to punish the defendant, not to compensate the plaintiff. Punitive damages are more common in tort and contract actions. For example, if a tenant maliciously damages rented property, the landlord may frequently recover as damages the actual cost of repairs plus additional damages as punitive damages.
Liquidated Damages. When two parties enter into a contract, in order to avoid the problems involved in proving actual damages, they may include a provision fixing the amount of damages to be paid in the event one party breaches the contract, such a provision is called liquidated damages. Such a clause in the contract specifies recoverable damages in the event that the plaintiff establishes a breach by the defendant. Liquidated damages must be reasonable and should be provided only in those cases where actual damages are difficult or impossible to prove. If the amount of damages fixed by the contract is unreasonable and in effect the damages are punitive, the court will not enforce this provision of the contract.
Rescind the Contract
When a contract is breached, the aggrieved party may elect to rescind the contract, which releases this party from all obligations not yet performed. If this party has executed the contract, the remedy is to sue for recovery of what was parted with. If the aggrieved party rescinds a contract for the sale of goods, damages for the breach may also be requested.
Sue for Specific Performance
In some cases neither a suit for damages nor rescission will constitute an adequate remedy. the injured party's remedy under these circumstances is a suit and equity to compel specific performance; that is, the carrying out of the specific terms of the contract.
This remedy is available in limited cases. This includes most contracts for the sale of real estate or any interest in real estate and for the sale of rare articles of personal property, such as a painting or an heirloom, the value of which cannot readily be determined. There is no way to measure sentimental value attached to a relic. Under such circumstances mere money damages may be inadequate to compensate the injured party. The court may compel specific performance under such circumstances.
As a general rule, contracts for the performance of personal services will not be specifically ordered. This is both because of the difficulty of supervision by the courts and because of the constitution's prohibition of involuntary servitude except as a criminal punishment.
Malpractice
A professional person, such as a lawyer, accountant, or doctor, who takes a contract to perform professional services has a duty to perform with the ability and care normally exercised by others in the profession. A contract not so performed is breached because of malpractice.
An accountant is liable to a client who suffers a loss because the accountant has not complied with accepted accounting practices.
In some cases, a person other than a party to the contract may sue a professional person for malpractice. In the case of a contract for accounting services, a third-party may, under certain circumstances, recover when the negligence or fraud by the accountant causes a loss to that party.
Internet Resources for Business Law
*SOURCE: LAW FOR BUSINESS, 15TH ED., 2005, JANET E. ASHCROFT, PGS. 139-145*
end
|
No comments:
Post a Comment